<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intrepid Blog &#187; westerbaan huurman notation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affien.com/archives/tag/westerbaan-huurman-notation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affien.com</link>
	<description>A few thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Westerbaan Huurman notation</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2005/11/15/westerbaan-huurman-notation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2005/11/15/westerbaan-huurman-notation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bas Westerbaan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westerbaan huurman notation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2005/11/15/westerbaan-huurman-notation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cn-H]1..8
[sigma(n,n+1)]1..3,5..7;
sigma(4,1);sigma(8,5);
[sigma(n,n+4)]1..4
and
C1-5,H-C2-6,H-C3-7,H-C4-8,H,1;
C5-H-C6-H-C7-C8-H;
and
[Cn-n+4,H]1..4;
[Cn-H]5..8;
sigma(4,1); sigma(8,5);
They all represent the same carbon cube. (C8H8)
Purpose; because the normal naming of chemistry can&#8217;t define all structures they come up with trivial names, which I find very annoying. This notation is intended to be able to describe every structure uniformly. And no, don&#8217;t even try to pronounce it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><code>[C<sub>n</sub>-H]<sup>1..8</sup><br />
[sigma(n,n+1)]<sup>1..3,5..7</sup>;<br />
sigma(4,1);sigma(8,5);<br />
[sigma(n,n+4)]<sup>1..4</sup></code></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><code>C<sub>1</sub>-5,H-C<sub>2</sub>-6,H-C<sub>3</sub>-7,H-C<sub>4</sub>-8,H,1;<br />
C<sub>5</sub>-H-C<sub>6</sub>-H-C<sub>7</sub>-C<sub>8</sub>-H;</code></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><code>[C<sub>n</sub>-n+4,H]<sup>1..4</sup>;<br />
[C<sub>n</sub>-H]<sup>5..8</sup>;<br />
sigma(4,1); sigma(8,5);</code></p>
<p>They all represent the same carbon cube. (C<sub>8</sub>H<sub>8</sub>)</p>
<p><ins>Purpose; because the normal naming of chemistry can&#8217;t define all structures they come up with trivial names, which I find very annoying. This notation is intended to be able to describe every structure uniformly. And no, don&#8217;t even try to pronounce it.</ins></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2005/11/15/westerbaan-huurman-notation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
