<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intrepid Blog &#187; virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affien.com/archives/tag/virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affien.com</link>
	<description>A few thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Virtualization isn&#8217;t hardware efficient</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/02/09/virtualization-isnt-hardware-efficient/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/02/09/virtualization-isnt-hardware-efficient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bas Westerbaan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2006/02/09/virtualization-isnt-hardware-efficient/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtualization is the thing right now. Escpacially because VMWare released VMServer for free.
I&#8217;ve read quite a lot of posts about the pro&#8217;s about virtualization, and I`m annoyed by some.
This for some claim that virtualization is hardware efficient. Quite frankly, it isn&#8217;t. It is quite inefficient.
The thing though is that you don&#8217;t use your server optimally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtualization is the thing right now. Escpacially because VMWare released VMServer for free.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read quite a lot of posts about the pro&#8217;s about virtualization, and I`m annoyed by some.</p>
<p>This for some <strong>claim that virtualization is hardware efficient</strong>. Quite frankly, it isn&#8217;t. It is quite inefficient.</p>
<p>The thing though is that you don&#8217;t use your server optimally usually, and that with virtualization you can more easily get most out of your server, although you could get more from your server if you wouldn&#8217;t use virtualization. But that is a lot trickier, virtualization is quite flexible.</p>
<p>Virtualization <strong>doesn&#8217;t make hardware more efficient</strong>, it <strong>makes you more efficient at allocating resources of your server</strong>.</p>
<p>This server, w-nz.com, runs on a virtual server. I can&#8217;t affort or would fully use a ful dedicated server, but I can affort and use a virtual server. Efficient. But running all sites on the real server on just one server would be more efficient, but harder to do, espacially related to security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/02/09/virtualization-isnt-hardware-efficient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
