<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intrepid Blog &#187; markup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affien.com/archives/tag/markup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affien.com</link>
	<description>A few thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Markup? Nah, wysiwyg!</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2004/12/18/markup-nah-wysiwyg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2004/12/18/markup-nah-wysiwyg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bas Westerbaan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wysiwyg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2004/12/18/markup-nah-wysiwyg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you post something on a forum, on a guestbook, on anything on the web which supports some kind of formatting of your code it works with some sort of BB-Code.
BB-Code is just like HTML formatting, with &#8216;[]&#8217;s instead of &#8216;&#8217;s, and a lot less features. It is hard to type and doesn&#8217;t look neat.
But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you post something on a forum, on a guestbook, on anything on the web which supports some kind of formatting of your code it works with some sort of <a href="http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/faq.php?mode=bbcode">BB-Code</a>.<br />
BB-Code is just like HTML formatting, with &#8216;[]&#8217;s instead of &#8216;<>&#8217;s, and a lot less features. It is hard to type and doesn&#8217;t look neat.</p>
<p>But who cares? Everyone uses BB-Code, almost everyone knows BB-Code, and most people don&#8217;t find it hard to type for people are just too used to it!</p>
<p>There are alternatives to BB-Code, like <a href="http://textism.com/tools/textile/">Textile</a> and <a href="http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/">Markdown</a>, which use a more convenient syntax.<br />
Personally I don&#8217;t like using them for I ain&#8217;t used to the syntax.</p>
<p>However.. why would we want to <em>write</em> formating anyway? Why not just use wysiwyg, and I do not mean a java applet but rather a standard for browsers; a new tag: &#8220;<code>&lt;input type="formatted" name="example" /&gt;</code>&#8220;, which would act for the server as a normal input field returning the formatted text in Html.</p>
<p>The problem is that it would be very hard to get every browser to support such a new tag. Most browsers I guess would be very willing to comply. But browsers like for instance Internet Explorer wouldn&#8217;t. They don&#8217;t even comply with the simplest of CSS at the moment which gives website developers a headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2004/12/18/markup-nah-wysiwyg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
