<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Cycle Detection in Directed Graphs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affien.com/archives/2007/07/02/online-cycle-detection-in-directed-graphs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2007/07/02/online-cycle-detection-in-directed-graphs/</link>
	<description>A few thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2007/07/02/online-cycle-detection-in-directed-graphs/comment-page-1/#comment-149301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2007/07/02/online-cycle-detection-in-directed-graphs/#comment-149301</guid>
		<description>I think you got this from the same place as I did, and this was one more reason to not apply :-)  Anyway, this seems to be still an active research topic; try to google for something like &#039;digraph incremental topological sort&#039;.  Note that it only makes sense to talk about complexity _per iteration_.  There are indeed a few algorithms more efficient than the naive O (n+l) per iteration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you got this from the same place as I did, and this was one more reason to not apply <img src='http://blog.affien.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Anyway, this seems to be still an active research topic; try to google for something like &#8216;digraph incremental topological sort&#8217;.  Note that it only makes sense to talk about complexity _per iteration_.  There are indeed a few algorithms more efficient than the naive O (n+l) per iteration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
