<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GMail`s strange perception of EMail size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/</link>
	<description>A few thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bas Westerbaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/comment-page-1/#comment-42018</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas Westerbaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/#comment-42018</guid>
		<description>The difference shouldn&#039;t be that great:

The raw size would when measuring in MB (1000kB) instead of MiB (1024kiB) be 2219MB -- this obviously is a bigger number. Now, as each email is only using 7 bits per character the &#039;real&#039; size of all my email is: &lt;code&gt;2219 / 8 * 7 = 1939&lt;/code&gt; -- this is less than the 2079MB reported by GMail. It gets even worse when I add in that attachments are encoded 6bits.

The MB/MiB issue does make a difference, but not that great as you have seen. There&#039;s still something else :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference shouldn&#8217;t be that great:</p>
<p>The raw size would when measuring in MB (1000kB) instead of MiB (1024kiB) be 2219MB &#8212; this obviously is a bigger number. Now, as each email is only using 7 bits per character the &#8216;real&#8217; size of all my email is: <code>2219 / 8 * 7 = 1939</code> &#8212; this is less than the 2079MB reported by GMail. It gets even worse when I add in that attachments are encoded 6bits.</p>
<p>The MB/MiB issue does make a difference, but not that great as you have seen. There&#8217;s still something else <img src='http://blog.affien.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.affien.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/comment-page-1/#comment-42017</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w-nz.com/archives/2006/05/02/gmails-strange-perception-of-email-size/#comment-42017</guid>
		<description>It appears that there is not problem.  Computers read file sizes differently based on if 1MB = 1000 Bytes or 1MB=1024 Bytes.  This is the same reason some harddrives appear to be smaller after hooking them up to your computer than what is listed on the box (sometimes you&#039;ll get lucky and get one slightly larger).  Google it, I remember a tech guru explaining this years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that there is not problem.  Computers read file sizes differently based on if 1MB = 1000 Bytes or 1MB=1024 Bytes.  This is the same reason some harddrives appear to be smaller after hooking them up to your computer than what is listed on the box (sometimes you&#8217;ll get lucky and get one slightly larger).  Google it, I remember a tech guru explaining this years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
